Burundi vs Malawi: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Burundi
755.19 cubic meters
in 2022
Malawi
784.69 cubic meters
in 2022
Burundi rank
143rd
Malawi rank
140th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Burundi
  • Malawi
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119912022

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 784.69 cubic meters against 755.19 cubic meters in Burundi, a difference of 29.5 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malawi ahead.

Burundi ranks 143rd and Malawi ranks 140th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 3,217 cubic meters 3,947 cubic meters 730.29 cubic meters Malawi
1970s 2,653 cubic meters 3,090 cubic meters 437.68 cubic meters Malawi
1980s 2,037 cubic meters 2,163 cubic meters 126.05 cubic meters Malawi
1990s 1,700 cubic meters 1,571 cubic meters 128.68 cubic meters Burundi
2000s 1,349 cubic meters 1,274 cubic meters 75.65 cubic meters Burundi
2010s 935.12 cubic meters 962.1 cubic meters 26.98 cubic meters Malawi
2020s 776.14 cubic meters 805.35 cubic meters 29.2 cubic meters Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Burundi or Malawi?
Malawi, at 784.69 cubic meters against 755.19 cubic meters in Burundi as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Burundi and Malawi?
29.5 cubic meters, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Malawi?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Burundi and Malawi rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Burundi ranks 143rd and Malawi ranks 140th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Malawi: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/burundi/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/burundi/malawi/">Burundi vs Malawi: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.