Bulgaria vs Mexico: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Bulgaria
3,248 cubic meters
in 2022
Mexico
3,180 cubic meters
in 2022
Bulgaria rank
78th
Mexico rank
80th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Mexico
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119912022

How they compare

Bulgaria currently reports 3,248 cubic meters against 3,180 cubic meters in Mexico, a difference of 68 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Bulgaria ranks 78th and Mexico ranks 80th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 2,563 cubic meters 9,505 cubic meters 6,942 cubic meters Mexico
1970s 2,419 cubic meters 7,077 cubic meters 4,658 cubic meters Mexico
1980s 2,351 cubic meters 5,526 cubic meters 3,175 cubic meters Mexico
1990s 2,490 cubic meters 4,555 cubic meters 2,065 cubic meters Mexico
2000s 2,721 cubic meters 3,895 cubic meters 1,174 cubic meters Mexico
2010s 2,992 cubic meters 3,409 cubic meters 417.77 cubic meters Mexico
2020s 3,227 cubic meters 3,203 cubic meters 23.78 cubic meters Bulgaria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Bulgaria or Mexico?
Bulgaria, at 3,248 cubic meters against 3,180 cubic meters in Mexico as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Bulgaria and Mexico?
68 cubic meters, with Bulgaria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Mexico?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Bulgaria and Mexico rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Bulgaria ranks 78th and Mexico ranks 80th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bulgaria vs Mexico: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bulgaria/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bulgaria/mexico/">Bulgaria vs Mexico: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.