Bulgaria vs Japan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Bulgaria
3,248 cubic meters
in 2022
Japan
3,437 cubic meters
in 2022
Bulgaria rank
78th
Japan rank
77th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Japan
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119912022

How they compare

Japan currently reports 3,437 cubic meters against 3,248 cubic meters in Bulgaria, a difference of 189 cubic meters.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Bulgaria's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Bulgaria ranks 78th and Japan ranks 77th of 183 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Japan Difference Ahead
1960s 2,563 cubic meters 4,392 cubic meters 1,829 cubic meters Japan
1970s 2,419 cubic meters 3,899 cubic meters 1,480 cubic meters Japan
1980s 2,351 cubic meters 3,577 cubic meters 1,226 cubic meters Japan
1990s 2,490 cubic meters 3,434 cubic meters 943.9 cubic meters Japan
2000s 2,721 cubic meters 3,368 cubic meters 647.65 cubic meters Japan
2010s 2,992 cubic meters 3,378 cubic meters 386.58 cubic meters Japan
2020s 3,227 cubic meters 3,421 cubic meters 194.14 cubic meters Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Bulgaria or Japan?
Japan, at 3,437 cubic meters against 3,248 cubic meters in Bulgaria as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Bulgaria and Japan?
189 cubic meters, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Japan?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Bulgaria and Japan rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Bulgaria ranks 78th and Japan ranks 77th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bulgaria vs Japan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bulgaria/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bulgaria/japan/">Bulgaria vs Japan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.