Brazil vs Uruguay: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Brazil
26,918 cubic meters
in 2022
Uruguay
27,190 cubic meters
in 2022
Brazil rank
24th
Uruguay rank
23rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Brazil
  • Uruguay
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119912022

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 27,190 cubic meters against 26,918 cubic meters in Brazil, a difference of 272 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 24th and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 6 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 67,889 cubic meters 34,480 cubic meters 33,408 cubic meters Brazil
1970s 53,375 cubic meters 32,192 cubic meters 21,183 cubic meters Brazil
1980s 42,404 cubic meters 30,601 cubic meters 11,803 cubic meters Brazil
1990s 35,350 cubic meters 28,993 cubic meters 6,357 cubic meters Brazil
2000s 30,890 cubic meters 28,053 cubic meters 2,836 cubic meters Brazil
2010s 28,212 cubic meters 27,434 cubic meters 777.64 cubic meters Brazil
2020s 27,021 cubic meters 27,153 cubic meters 132.37 cubic meters Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Brazil or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 27,190 cubic meters against 26,918 cubic meters in Brazil as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Brazil and Uruguay?
272 cubic meters, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Uruguay?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Brazil and Uruguay rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Brazil ranks 24th and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Uruguay: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/brazil/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/brazil/uruguay/">Brazil vs Uruguay: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.