Brazil vs IDA only: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Brazil
26,918 cubic meters
in 2022
IDA only
4,238 cubic meters
in 2022
Brazil rank
24th
IDA only rank
23rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Brazil
  • IDA only
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119912022

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 26,918 cubic meters against 4,238 cubic meters in IDA only, a difference of 22,680 cubic meters.

That makes Brazil's figure about 6.4 times IDA only's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 24th and IDA only ranks 23rd of 183 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil IDA only Difference Ahead
1960s 67,889 cubic meters 18,680 cubic meters 49,208 cubic meters Brazil
1970s 53,375 cubic meters 14,713 cubic meters 38,662 cubic meters Brazil
1980s 42,404 cubic meters 11,528 cubic meters 30,876 cubic meters Brazil
1990s 35,350 cubic meters 8,572 cubic meters 26,778 cubic meters Brazil
2000s 30,890 cubic meters 6,557 cubic meters 24,332 cubic meters Brazil
2010s 28,212 cubic meters 5,071 cubic meters 23,141 cubic meters Brazil
2020s 27,021 cubic meters 4,334 cubic meters 22,687 cubic meters Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Brazil or IDA only?
Brazil, at 26,918 cubic meters against 4,238 cubic meters in IDA only as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Brazil and IDA only?
22,680 cubic meters, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and IDA only?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Brazil and IDA only rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Brazil ranks 24th and IDA only ranks 23rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs IDA only: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/brazil/ida-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/brazil/ida-only/">Brazil vs IDA only: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.