Brazil vs Ecuador: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Brazil
26,918 cubic meters
in 2022
Ecuador
24,821 cubic meters
in 2022
Brazil rank
24th
Ecuador rank
27th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Brazil
  • Ecuador
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119912022

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 26,918 cubic meters against 24,821 cubic meters in Ecuador, a difference of 2,097 cubic meters.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Brazil ranks 24th and Ecuador ranks 27th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 67,889 cubic meters 83,597 cubic meters 15,708 cubic meters Ecuador
1970s 53,375 cubic meters 63,336 cubic meters 9,961 cubic meters Ecuador
1980s 42,404 cubic meters 48,358 cubic meters 5,953 cubic meters Ecuador
1990s 35,350 cubic meters 38,660 cubic meters 3,310 cubic meters Ecuador
2000s 30,890 cubic meters 32,282 cubic meters 1,392 cubic meters Ecuador
2010s 28,212 cubic meters 27,405 cubic meters 806.35 cubic meters Brazil
2020s 27,021 cubic meters 25,018 cubic meters 2,003 cubic meters Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Brazil or Ecuador?
Brazil, at 26,918 cubic meters against 24,821 cubic meters in Ecuador as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Brazil and Ecuador?
2,097 cubic meters, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Ecuador?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Brazil and Ecuador rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Brazil ranks 24th and Ecuador ranks 27th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Ecuador: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/brazil/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/brazil/ecuador/">Brazil vs Ecuador: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.