Botswana vs Ghana: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Botswana
983.65 cubic meters
in 2022
Ghana
914.05 cubic meters
in 2022
Botswana rank
129th
Ghana rank
132nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Botswana
  • Ghana
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119912022

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 983.65 cubic meters against 914.05 cubic meters in Ghana, a difference of 69.6 cubic meters.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Ghana's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 129th and Ghana ranks 132nd of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 4 and Ghana in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Ghana Difference Ahead
1960s 4,247 cubic meters 3,850 cubic meters 397.34 cubic meters Botswana
1970s 3,408 cubic meters 2,994 cubic meters 414.09 cubic meters Botswana
1980s 2,196 cubic meters 2,259 cubic meters 62.85 cubic meters Ghana
1990s 1,635 cubic meters 1,768 cubic meters 133.1 cubic meters Ghana
2000s 1,316 cubic meters 1,373 cubic meters 56.55 cubic meters Ghana
2010s 1,100 cubic meters 1,073 cubic meters 27.03 cubic meters Botswana
2020s 999.16 cubic meters 932.01 cubic meters 67.15 cubic meters Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Botswana or Ghana?
Botswana, at 983.65 cubic meters against 914.05 cubic meters in Ghana as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Botswana and Ghana?
69.6 cubic meters, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Ghana?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Botswana and Ghana rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Botswana ranks 129th and Ghana ranks 132nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Ghana: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/botswana/ghana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/botswana/ghana/">Botswana vs Ghana: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.