Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Lower middle income: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Bosnia and Herzegovina
11,077 cubic meters
in 2022
Lower middle income
2,496 cubic meters
in 2022
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
41st
Lower middle income rank
41st

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Lower middle income
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k196119912022

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 11,077 cubic meters against 2,496 cubic meters in Lower middle income, a difference of 8,581 cubic meters.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 4.4 times Lower middle income's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 41st and Lower middle income ranks 41st of 183 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Lower middle income Difference Ahead
1990s 8,979 cubic meters 3,940 cubic meters 5,039 cubic meters Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 8,696 cubic meters 3,287 cubic meters 5,410 cubic meters Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 10,002 cubic meters 2,770 cubic meters 7,232 cubic meters Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 10,926 cubic meters 2,525 cubic meters 8,401 cubic meters Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Lower middle income?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 11,077 cubic meters against 2,496 cubic meters in Lower middle income as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Lower middle income?
8,581 cubic meters, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Lower middle income?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Lower middle income rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 41st and Lower middle income ranks 41st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Lower middle income: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bosnia-and-herzegovina/lower-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bosnia-and-herzegovina/lower-middle-income/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Lower middle income: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.