Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Georgia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Bosnia and Herzegovina
11,077 cubic meters
in 2022
Georgia
15,658 cubic meters
in 2022
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
41st
Georgia rank
39th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Georgia
05.0k10.0k15.0k199220072022

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 15,658 cubic meters against 11,077 cubic meters in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 4,581 cubic meters.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.4 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 41st and Georgia ranks 39th of 183 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 8,979 cubic meters 12,781 cubic meters 3,803 cubic meters Georgia
2000s 8,696 cubic meters 14,814 cubic meters 6,118 cubic meters Georgia
2010s 10,002 cubic meters 15,570 cubic meters 5,568 cubic meters Georgia
2020s 10,926 cubic meters 15,649 cubic meters 4,723 cubic meters Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Georgia?
Georgia, at 15,658 cubic meters against 11,077 cubic meters in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Georgia?
4,581 cubic meters, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Georgia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Georgia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 41st and Georgia ranks 39th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Georgia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bosnia-and-herzegovina/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bosnia-and-herzegovina/georgia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Georgia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.