Bolivia vs IDA total: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Bolivia
25,130 cubic meters
in 2022
IDA total
3,750 cubic meters
in 2022
Bolivia rank
26th
IDA total rank
28th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Bolivia
  • IDA total
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119912022

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 25,130 cubic meters against 3,750 cubic meters in IDA total, a difference of 21,380 cubic meters.

That makes Bolivia's figure about 6.7 times IDA total's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Bolivia has been ahead every year.

Bolivia ranks 26th and IDA total ranks 28th of 183 countries.

Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia IDA total Difference Ahead
1960s 73,898 cubic meters 17,074 cubic meters 56,824 cubic meters Bolivia
1970s 59,850 cubic meters 13,357 cubic meters 46,494 cubic meters Bolivia
1980s 47,919 cubic meters 10,202 cubic meters 37,717 cubic meters Bolivia
1990s 39,034 cubic meters 7,472 cubic meters 31,562 cubic meters Bolivia
2000s 32,729 cubic meters 5,707 cubic meters 27,022 cubic meters Bolivia
2010s 27,821 cubic meters 4,444 cubic meters 23,377 cubic meters Bolivia
2020s 25,413 cubic meters 3,831 cubic meters 21,582 cubic meters Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Bolivia or IDA total?
Bolivia, at 25,130 cubic meters against 3,750 cubic meters in IDA total as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Bolivia and IDA total?
21,380 cubic meters, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and IDA total?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Bolivia and IDA total rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Bolivia ranks 26th and IDA total ranks 28th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs IDA total: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bolivia/ida-total/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bolivia/ida-total/">Bolivia vs IDA total: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.