What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?

21,012 cubic meters, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?

62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Bolivia, Plurinational State of

25,130 cubic meters

in 2022

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)

4,118 cubic meters

in 2022

Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank

26th

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank

25th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

Bolivia, Plurinational State of
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)

How they compare

Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 25,130 cubic meters against 4,118 cubic meters in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 21,012 cubic meters.

That makes Bolivia, Plurinational State of's figure about 6.1 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Bolivia, Plurinational State of has been ahead every year.

Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 26th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 25th of 183 countries.

Bolivia, Plurinational State of has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bolivia, Plurinational State of	East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)	Difference	Ahead
1960s	73,898 cubic meters	8,967 cubic meters	64,931 cubic meters	Bolivia, Plurinational State of
1970s	59,850 cubic meters	7,142 cubic meters	52,708 cubic meters	Bolivia, Plurinational State of
1980s	47,919 cubic meters	6,022 cubic meters	41,897 cubic meters	Bolivia, Plurinational State of
1990s	39,034 cubic meters	5,163 cubic meters	33,870 cubic meters	Bolivia, Plurinational State of
2000s	32,729 cubic meters	4,650 cubic meters	28,079 cubic meters	Bolivia, Plurinational State of
2010s	27,821 cubic meters	4,296 cubic meters	23,525 cubic meters	Bolivia, Plurinational State of
2020s	25,413 cubic meters	4,128 cubic meters	21,285 cubic meters	Bolivia, Plurinational State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?: Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 25,130 cubic meters against 4,118 cubic meters in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?: 21,012 cubic meters, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?: 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?: Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 26th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 25th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bolivia/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bolivia/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/">Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit: cubic meters
Source: AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.