Bolivia vs Costa Rica: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)

Bolivia
25,130 cubic meters
in 2022
Costa Rica
22,236 cubic meters
in 2022
Bolivia rank
26th
Costa Rica rank
29th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters) over time

  • Bolivia
  • Costa Rica
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119912022

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 25,130 cubic meters against 22,236 cubic meters in Costa Rica, a difference of 2,894 cubic meters.

That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Bolivia ranks 26th and Costa Rica ranks 29th of 183 countries.

Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1960s 73,898 cubic meters 71,800 cubic meters 2,098 cubic meters Bolivia
1970s 59,850 cubic meters 54,814 cubic meters 5,036 cubic meters Bolivia
1980s 47,919 cubic meters 41,951 cubic meters 5,968 cubic meters Bolivia
1990s 39,034 cubic meters 32,504 cubic meters 6,530 cubic meters Bolivia
2000s 32,729 cubic meters 26,784 cubic meters 5,944 cubic meters Bolivia
2010s 27,821 cubic meters 23,627 cubic meters 4,194 cubic meters Bolivia
2020s 25,413 cubic meters 22,338 cubic meters 3,075 cubic meters Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Bolivia or Costa Rica?
Bolivia, at 25,130 cubic meters against 22,236 cubic meters in Costa Rica as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Bolivia and Costa Rica?
2,894 cubic meters, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Costa Rica?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Bolivia and Costa Rica rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Bolivia ranks 26th and Costa Rica ranks 29th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Costa Rica: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bolivia/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bolivia/costa-rica/">Bolivia vs Costa Rica: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.