Bhutan vs Suriname: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Bhutan
99,883 cubic meters
in 2022
Suriname
158,867 cubic meters
in 2022
Bhutan rank
4th
Suriname rank
3rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Bhutan
  • Suriname
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119912022

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 158,867 cubic meters against 99,883 cubic meters in Bhutan, a difference of 58,984 cubic meters.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.6 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 4th and Suriname ranks 3rd of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 364,367 cubic meters 312,389 cubic meters 51,978 cubic meters Bhutan
1970s 265,423 cubic meters 255,107 cubic meters 10,316 cubic meters Bhutan
1980s 190,847 cubic meters 255,687 cubic meters 64,840 cubic meters Suriname
1990s 152,305 cubic meters 229,156 cubic meters 76,850 cubic meters Suriname
2000s 122,008 cubic meters 193,072 cubic meters 71,065 cubic meters Suriname
2010s 106,147 cubic meters 171,396 cubic meters 65,249 cubic meters Suriname
2020s 100,590 cubic meters 160,256 cubic meters 59,667 cubic meters Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Bhutan or Suriname?
Suriname, at 158,867 cubic meters against 99,883 cubic meters in Bhutan as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Bhutan and Suriname?
58,984 cubic meters, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Suriname?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Bhutan and Suriname rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Bhutan ranks 4th and Suriname ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Suriname: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bhutan/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bhutan/suriname/">Bhutan vs Suriname: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.