Bhutan vs Small states: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Bhutan
99,883 cubic meters
in 2022
Small states
39,669 cubic meters
in 2022
Bhutan rank
4th
Small states rank
3rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Bhutan
  • Small states
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119912022

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 99,883 cubic meters against 39,669 cubic meters in Small states, a difference of 60,214 cubic meters.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 2.5 times Small states's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 4th and Small states ranks 3rd of 183 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Small states Difference Ahead
1960s 358,417 cubic meters 98,073 cubic meters 260,344 cubic meters Bhutan
1970s 265,423 cubic meters 83,376 cubic meters 182,047 cubic meters Bhutan
1980s 190,847 cubic meters 70,213 cubic meters 120,634 cubic meters Bhutan
1990s 152,305 cubic meters 54,924 cubic meters 97,382 cubic meters Bhutan
2000s 122,008 cubic meters 47,867 cubic meters 74,141 cubic meters Bhutan
2010s 106,147 cubic meters 42,968 cubic meters 63,180 cubic meters Bhutan
2020s 100,590 cubic meters 40,065 cubic meters 60,525 cubic meters Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Bhutan or Small states?
Bhutan, at 99,883 cubic meters against 39,669 cubic meters in Small states as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Bhutan and Small states?
60,214 cubic meters, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Small states?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2022.
How do Bhutan and Small states rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Bhutan ranks 4th and Small states ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Small states: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bhutan/small-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bhutan/small-states/">Bhutan vs Small states: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.