Bhutan vs Norway: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Bhutan
99,883 cubic meters
in 2022
Norway
70,000 cubic meters
in 2022
Bhutan rank
4th
Norway rank
7th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Bhutan
  • Norway
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119912022

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 99,883 cubic meters against 70,000 cubic meters in Norway, a difference of 29,883 cubic meters.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.4 times Norway's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 4th and Norway ranks 7th of 183 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 364,367 cubic meters 102,565 cubic meters 261,802 cubic meters Bhutan
1970s 265,423 cubic meters 95,847 cubic meters 169,576 cubic meters Bhutan
1980s 190,847 cubic meters 92,032 cubic meters 98,815 cubic meters Bhutan
1990s 152,305 cubic meters 87,885 cubic meters 64,421 cubic meters Bhutan
2000s 122,008 cubic meters 82,567 cubic meters 39,441 cubic meters Bhutan
2010s 106,147 cubic meters 74,327 cubic meters 31,820 cubic meters Bhutan
2020s 100,590 cubic meters 70,548 cubic meters 30,042 cubic meters Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Bhutan or Norway?
Bhutan, at 99,883 cubic meters against 70,000 cubic meters in Norway as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Bhutan and Norway?
29,883 cubic meters, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Norway?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Bhutan and Norway rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Bhutan ranks 4th and Norway ranks 7th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Norway: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bhutan/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bhutan/norway/">Bhutan vs Norway: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.