Bhutan vs Iceland: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Bhutan
99,883 cubic meters
in 2022
Iceland
445,023 cubic meters
in 2022
Bhutan rank
4th
Iceland rank
1st

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Bhutan
  • Iceland
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196119912022

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 445,023 cubic meters against 99,883 cubic meters in Bhutan, a difference of 345,140 cubic meters.

That makes Iceland's figure about 4.5 times Bhutan's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 4th and Iceland ranks 1st of 183 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 364,367 cubic meters 887,253 cubic meters 522,886 cubic meters Iceland
1970s 265,423 cubic meters 789,202 cubic meters 523,779 cubic meters Iceland
1980s 190,847 cubic meters 708,373 cubic meters 517,526 cubic meters Iceland
1990s 152,305 cubic meters 638,939 cubic meters 486,634 cubic meters Iceland
2000s 122,008 cubic meters 570,906 cubic meters 448,898 cubic meters Iceland
2010s 106,147 cubic meters 511,100 cubic meters 404,953 cubic meters Iceland
2020s 100,590 cubic meters 455,089 cubic meters 354,500 cubic meters Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Bhutan or Iceland?
Iceland, at 445,023 cubic meters against 99,883 cubic meters in Bhutan as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Bhutan and Iceland?
345,140 cubic meters, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Iceland?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Bhutan and Iceland rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Bhutan ranks 4th and Iceland ranks 1st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Iceland: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bhutan/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bhutan/iceland/">Bhutan vs Iceland: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.