Belgium vs Nigeria: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Belgium
1,027 cubic meters
in 2022
Nigeria
990.36 cubic meters
in 2022
Belgium rank
125th
Nigeria rank
128th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Belgium
  • Nigeria
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119912022

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 1,027 cubic meters against 990.36 cubic meters in Nigeria, a difference of 36.64 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nigeria ahead.

Belgium ranks 125th and Nigeria ranks 128th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Nigeria in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 1,272 cubic meters 4,418 cubic meters 3,146 cubic meters Nigeria
1970s 1,228 cubic meters 3,529 cubic meters 2,300 cubic meters Nigeria
1980s 1,216 cubic meters 2,649 cubic meters 1,433 cubic meters Nigeria
1990s 1,187 cubic meters 2,027 cubic meters 840.26 cubic meters Nigeria
2000s 1,145 cubic meters 1,550 cubic meters 404.76 cubic meters Nigeria
2010s 1,069 cubic meters 1,181 cubic meters 111.85 cubic meters Nigeria
2020s 1,034 cubic meters 1,011 cubic meters 22.9 cubic meters Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Belgium or Nigeria?
Belgium, at 1,027 cubic meters against 990.36 cubic meters in Nigeria as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Belgium and Nigeria?
36.64 cubic meters, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Nigeria?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Belgium and Nigeria rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Belgium ranks 125th and Nigeria ranks 128th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Nigeria: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/belgium/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/belgium/nigeria/">Belgium vs Nigeria: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.