Belgium vs Denmark: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Belgium
1,027 cubic meters
in 2022
Denmark
1,016 cubic meters
in 2022
Belgium rank
125th
Denmark rank
126th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Belgium
  • Denmark
05001.0k1.5k196119912022

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 1,027 cubic meters against 1,016 cubic meters in Denmark, a difference of 11 cubic meters.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 125th and Denmark ranks 126th of 183 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Denmark Difference Ahead
1960s 1,272 cubic meters 1,262 cubic meters 10.59 cubic meters Belgium
1970s 1,228 cubic meters 1,191 cubic meters 37.6 cubic meters Belgium
1980s 1,216 cubic meters 1,172 cubic meters 44.02 cubic meters Belgium
1990s 1,187 cubic meters 1,148 cubic meters 38.7 cubic meters Belgium
2000s 1,145 cubic meters 1,107 cubic meters 38.02 cubic meters Belgium
2010s 1,069 cubic meters 1,057 cubic meters 11.28 cubic meters Belgium
2020s 1,034 cubic meters 1,023 cubic meters 11.1 cubic meters Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Belgium or Denmark?
Belgium, at 1,027 cubic meters against 1,016 cubic meters in Denmark as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Belgium and Denmark?
11 cubic meters, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Denmark?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Belgium and Denmark rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Belgium ranks 125th and Denmark ranks 126th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Denmark: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/belgium/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/belgium/denmark/">Belgium vs Denmark: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.