Belarus vs Portugal: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Belarus
3,684 cubic meters
in 2022
Portugal
3,642 cubic meters
in 2022
Belarus rank
73rd
Portugal rank
74th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Belarus
  • Portugal
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119912022

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 3,684 cubic meters against 3,642 cubic meters in Portugal, a difference of 42 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Portugal ahead.

Belarus ranks 73rd and Portugal ranks 74th of 183 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Portugal Difference Ahead
1990s 3,348 cubic meters 3,777 cubic meters 429.58 cubic meters Portugal
2000s 3,500 cubic meters 3,629 cubic meters 129.07 cubic meters Portugal
2010s 3,597 cubic meters 3,652 cubic meters 55.53 cubic meters Portugal
2020s 3,655 cubic meters 3,666 cubic meters 11.81 cubic meters Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Belarus or Portugal?
Belarus, at 3,684 cubic meters against 3,642 cubic meters in Portugal as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Belarus and Portugal?
42 cubic meters, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Portugal?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Belarus and Portugal rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Belarus ranks 73rd and Portugal ranks 74th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Portugal: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/belarus/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/belarus/portugal/">Belarus vs Portugal: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.