Barbados vs Pakistan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Barbados
283.37 cubic meters
in 2022
Pakistan
225.69 cubic meters
in 2022
Barbados rank
162nd
Pakistan rank
165th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Barbados
  • Pakistan
2004006008001.0k1.2k196119912022

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 283.37 cubic meters against 225.69 cubic meters in Pakistan, a difference of 57.68 cubic meters.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.3 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Pakistan ahead.

Barbados ranks 162nd and Pakistan ranks 165th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 330.7 cubic meters 1,055 cubic meters 724.01 cubic meters Pakistan
1970s 319.19 cubic meters 804.54 cubic meters 485.35 cubic meters Pakistan
1980s 313.58 cubic meters 572.09 cubic meters 258.51 cubic meters Pakistan
1990s 306.22 cubic meters 416.26 cubic meters 110.04 cubic meters Pakistan
2000s 298.74 cubic meters 317.85 cubic meters 19.11 cubic meters Pakistan
2010s 287.27 cubic meters 255.81 cubic meters 31.46 cubic meters Barbados
2020s 283.63 cubic meters 229.8 cubic meters 53.84 cubic meters Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Barbados or Pakistan?
Barbados, at 283.37 cubic meters against 225.69 cubic meters in Pakistan as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Barbados and Pakistan?
57.68 cubic meters, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Pakistan?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Barbados and Pakistan rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Barbados ranks 162nd and Pakistan ranks 165th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Pakistan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/barbados/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/barbados/pakistan/">Barbados vs Pakistan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.