Bangladesh vs Netherlands: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Bangladesh
619.89 cubic meters
in 2022
Netherlands
621.43 cubic meters
in 2022
Bangladesh rank
150th
Netherlands rank
149th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Netherlands
5001.0k1.5k2.0k196119912022

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 621.43 cubic meters against 619.89 cubic meters in Bangladesh, a difference of 1.54 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 150th and Netherlands ranks 149th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 6 and Netherlands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Netherlands Difference Ahead
1960s 1,758 cubic meters 896.94 cubic meters 860.87 cubic meters Bangladesh
1970s 1,371 cubic meters 810.32 cubic meters 560.54 cubic meters Bangladesh
1980s 1,067 cubic meters 759.63 cubic meters 307.51 cubic meters Bangladesh
1990s 865.79 cubic meters 714.51 cubic meters 151.29 cubic meters Bangladesh
2000s 733.39 cubic meters 676.37 cubic meters 57.02 cubic meters Bangladesh
2010s 662.41 cubic meters 649.43 cubic meters 12.98 cubic meters Bangladesh
2020s 625.85 cubic meters 626.5 cubic meters 0.6473 cubic meters Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Bangladesh or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 621.43 cubic meters against 619.89 cubic meters in Bangladesh as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Bangladesh and Netherlands?
1.54 cubic meters, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Netherlands?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Bangladesh and Netherlands rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Bangladesh ranks 150th and Netherlands ranks 149th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Netherlands: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bangladesh/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bangladesh/netherlands/">Bangladesh vs Netherlands: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.