Bangladesh vs Cape Verde: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Bangladesh
619.89 cubic meters
in 2022
Cape Verde
577.21 cubic meters
in 2022
Bangladesh rank
150th
Cape Verde rank
152nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Cape Verde
5001.0k1.5k2.0k196119912022

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 619.89 cubic meters against 577.21 cubic meters in Cape Verde, a difference of 42.68 cubic meters.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Cape Verde's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 150th and Cape Verde ranks 152nd of 183 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Cape Verde Difference Ahead
1960s 1,758 cubic meters 1,229 cubic meters 528.49 cubic meters Bangladesh
1970s 1,371 cubic meters 986.03 cubic meters 384.82 cubic meters Bangladesh
1980s 1,067 cubic meters 870.74 cubic meters 196.4 cubic meters Bangladesh
1990s 865.79 cubic meters 728.9 cubic meters 136.9 cubic meters Bangladesh
2000s 733.39 cubic meters 624.09 cubic meters 109.31 cubic meters Bangladesh
2010s 662.41 cubic meters 585.59 cubic meters 76.82 cubic meters Bangladesh
2020s 625.85 cubic meters 580.25 cubic meters 45.6 cubic meters Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Bangladesh or Cape Verde?
Bangladesh, at 619.89 cubic meters against 577.21 cubic meters in Cape Verde as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Bangladesh and Cape Verde?
42.68 cubic meters, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Cape Verde?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Bangladesh and Cape Verde rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Bangladesh ranks 150th and Cape Verde ranks 152nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Cape Verde: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bangladesh/cabo-verde/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bangladesh/cabo-verde/">Bangladesh vs Cape Verde: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.