Bahamas vs Grenada: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Bahamas
1,761 cubic meters
in 2022
Grenada
1,711 cubic meters
in 2022
Bahamas rank
107th
Grenada rank
108th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Bahamas
  • Grenada
2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k6.0k196119912022

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 1,761 cubic meters against 1,711 cubic meters in Grenada, a difference of 50 cubic meters.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Bahamas has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 107th and Grenada ranks 108th of 183 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Grenada Difference Ahead
1960s 4,649 cubic meters 2,046 cubic meters 2,602 cubic meters Bahamas
1970s 3,391 cubic meters 2,046 cubic meters 1,344 cubic meters Bahamas
1980s 2,792 cubic meters 2,081 cubic meters 710.37 cubic meters Bahamas
1990s 2,351 cubic meters 1,934 cubic meters 416.67 cubic meters Bahamas
2000s 2,046 cubic meters 1,827 cubic meters 218.96 cubic meters Bahamas
2010s 1,830 cubic meters 1,753 cubic meters 76.78 cubic meters Bahamas
2020s 1,765 cubic meters 1,715 cubic meters 50.47 cubic meters Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Bahamas or Grenada?
Bahamas, at 1,761 cubic meters against 1,711 cubic meters in Grenada as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Bahamas and Grenada?
50 cubic meters, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Grenada?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2022.
How do Bahamas and Grenada rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Bahamas ranks 107th and Grenada ranks 108th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Grenada: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bahamas-the/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bahamas-the/grenada/">Bahamas vs Grenada: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.