Bahamas vs China: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Bahamas
1,761 cubic meters
in 2022
China
1,992 cubic meters
in 2022
Bahamas rank
107th
China rank
106th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Bahamas
  • China
2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k6.0k196119912022

How they compare

China currently reports 1,992 cubic meters against 1,761 cubic meters in Bahamas, a difference of 231 cubic meters.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 107th and China ranks 106th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 3 and China in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas China Difference Ahead
1960s 4,769 cubic meters 3,921 cubic meters 847.86 cubic meters Bahamas
1970s 3,391 cubic meters 3,128 cubic meters 262.88 cubic meters Bahamas
1980s 2,792 cubic meters 2,692 cubic meters 99.22 cubic meters Bahamas
1990s 2,351 cubic meters 2,353 cubic meters 1.52 cubic meters China
2000s 2,046 cubic meters 2,166 cubic meters 120.04 cubic meters China
2010s 1,830 cubic meters 2,047 cubic meters 216.9 cubic meters China
2020s 1,765 cubic meters 1,992 cubic meters 227.26 cubic meters China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Bahamas or China?
China, at 1,992 cubic meters against 1,761 cubic meters in Bahamas as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Bahamas and China?
231 cubic meters, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and China?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Bahamas and China rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Bahamas ranks 107th and China ranks 106th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs China: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bahamas-the/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/bahamas-the/china/">Bahamas vs China: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.