Azerbaijan vs Malawi: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Azerbaijan
800.16 cubic meters
in 2022
Malawi
784.69 cubic meters
in 2022
Azerbaijan rank
138th
Malawi rank
140th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Malawi
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119912022

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 800.16 cubic meters against 784.69 cubic meters in Malawi, a difference of 15.47 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Malawi ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 138th and Malawi ranks 140th of 183 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 1,054 cubic meters 1,548 cubic meters 494.3 cubic meters Malawi
2000s 966.63 cubic meters 1,274 cubic meters 307.14 cubic meters Malawi
2010s 848.88 cubic meters 962.1 cubic meters 113.22 cubic meters Malawi
2020s 801.55 cubic meters 805.35 cubic meters 3.8 cubic meters Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Azerbaijan or Malawi?
Azerbaijan, at 800.16 cubic meters against 784.69 cubic meters in Malawi as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Azerbaijan and Malawi?
15.47 cubic meters, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Malawi?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Azerbaijan and Malawi rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Azerbaijan ranks 138th and Malawi ranks 140th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Malawi: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/azerbaijan/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/azerbaijan/malawi/">Azerbaijan vs Malawi: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.