Austria vs Guatemala: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Austria
6,083 cubic meters
in 2022
Guatemala
6,118 cubic meters
in 2022
Austria rank
63rd
Guatemala rank
62nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Austria
  • Guatemala
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119912022

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 6,118 cubic meters against 6,083 cubic meters in Austria, a difference of 35 cubic meters.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 63rd and Guatemala ranks 62nd of 183 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 7,566 cubic meters 23,300 cubic meters 15,734 cubic meters Guatemala
1970s 7,283 cubic meters 18,134 cubic meters 10,851 cubic meters Guatemala
1980s 7,263 cubic meters 14,122 cubic meters 6,859 cubic meters Guatemala
1990s 6,967 cubic meters 10,771 cubic meters 3,804 cubic meters Guatemala
2000s 6,718 cubic meters 8,465 cubic meters 1,747 cubic meters Guatemala
2010s 6,390 cubic meters 6,922 cubic meters 531.57 cubic meters Guatemala
2020s 6,131 cubic meters 6,205 cubic meters 74.16 cubic meters Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Austria or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 6,118 cubic meters against 6,083 cubic meters in Austria as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Austria and Guatemala?
35 cubic meters, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Guatemala?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Austria and Guatemala rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Austria ranks 63rd and Guatemala ranks 62nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Guatemala: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/austria/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/austria/guatemala/">Austria vs Guatemala: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.