Australia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Australia
18,910 cubic meters
in 2022
Sub-Saharan Africa
3,162 cubic meters
in 2022
Australia rank
32nd
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
32nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Australia
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119912022

How they compare

Australia currently reports 18,910 cubic meters against 3,162 cubic meters in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 15,748 cubic meters.

That makes Australia's figure about 6.0 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 32nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 32nd of 183 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 43,327 cubic meters 17,025 cubic meters 26,302 cubic meters Australia
1970s 36,064 cubic meters 13,232 cubic meters 22,832 cubic meters Australia
1980s 31,355 cubic meters 9,858 cubic meters 21,497 cubic meters Australia
1990s 27,460 cubic meters 7,098 cubic meters 20,362 cubic meters Australia
2000s 24,415 cubic meters 5,291 cubic meters 19,124 cubic meters Australia
2010s 20,836 cubic meters 3,895 cubic meters 16,940 cubic meters Australia
2020s 19,082 cubic meters 3,243 cubic meters 15,839 cubic meters Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Australia or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Australia, at 18,910 cubic meters against 3,162 cubic meters in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Australia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
15,748 cubic meters, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Australia and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Australia ranks 32nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 32nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/australia/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/australia/sub-saharan-africa/">Australia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.