Australia vs Paraguay: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Australia
18,910 cubic meters
in 2022
Paraguay
17,306 cubic meters
in 2022
Australia rank
32nd
Paraguay rank
35th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Australia
  • Paraguay
20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k60.0k196119912022

How they compare

Australia currently reports 18,910 cubic meters against 17,306 cubic meters in Paraguay, a difference of 1,604 cubic meters.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Paraguay ahead.

Australia ranks 32nd and Paraguay ranks 35th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 4 and Paraguay in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Paraguay Difference Ahead
1960s 43,327 cubic meters 55,214 cubic meters 11,886 cubic meters Paraguay
1970s 36,064 cubic meters 44,089 cubic meters 8,025 cubic meters Paraguay
1980s 31,355 cubic meters 33,905 cubic meters 2,550 cubic meters Paraguay
1990s 27,460 cubic meters 25,989 cubic meters 1,471 cubic meters Australia
2000s 24,415 cubic meters 21,665 cubic meters 2,749 cubic meters Australia
2010s 20,836 cubic meters 19,152 cubic meters 1,683 cubic meters Australia
2020s 19,082 cubic meters 17,509 cubic meters 1,573 cubic meters Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Australia or Paraguay?
Australia, at 18,910 cubic meters against 17,306 cubic meters in Paraguay as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Australia and Paraguay?
1,604 cubic meters, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Paraguay?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Australia and Paraguay rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Australia ranks 32nd and Paraguay ranks 35th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Paraguay: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/australia/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/australia/paraguay/">Australia vs Paraguay: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.