Australia vs Myanmar: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Australia
18,910 cubic meters
in 2022
Myanmar
18,654 cubic meters
in 2022
Australia rank
32nd
Myanmar rank
34th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Australia
  • Myanmar
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119912022

How they compare

Australia currently reports 18,910 cubic meters against 18,654 cubic meters in Myanmar, a difference of 256 cubic meters.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 32nd and Myanmar ranks 34th of 183 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 43,327 cubic meters 41,357 cubic meters 1,970 cubic meters Australia
1970s 36,064 cubic meters 33,659 cubic meters 2,405 cubic meters Australia
1980s 31,355 cubic meters 27,755 cubic meters 3,600 cubic meters Australia
1990s 27,460 cubic meters 23,727 cubic meters 3,733 cubic meters Australia
2000s 24,415 cubic meters 21,283 cubic meters 3,132 cubic meters Australia
2010s 20,836 cubic meters 19,727 cubic meters 1,109 cubic meters Australia
2020s 19,082 cubic meters 18,784 cubic meters 297.73 cubic meters Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Australia or Myanmar?
Australia, at 18,910 cubic meters against 18,654 cubic meters in Myanmar as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Australia and Myanmar?
256 cubic meters, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Myanmar?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Australia and Myanmar rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Australia ranks 32nd and Myanmar ranks 34th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Myanmar: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/australia/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/australia/myanmar/">Australia vs Myanmar: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.