Australia vs Finland: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Australia
18,910 cubic meters
in 2022
Finland
19,258 cubic meters
in 2022
Australia rank
32nd
Finland rank
31st

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Australia
  • Finland
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119912022

How they compare

Finland currently reports 19,258 cubic meters against 18,910 cubic meters in Australia, a difference of 348 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 32nd and Finland ranks 31st of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 6 and Finland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 43,327 cubic meters 23,477 cubic meters 19,850 cubic meters Australia
1970s 36,064 cubic meters 22,814 cubic meters 13,250 cubic meters Australia
1980s 31,355 cubic meters 21,926 cubic meters 9,429 cubic meters Australia
1990s 27,460 cubic meters 21,029 cubic meters 6,431 cubic meters Australia
2000s 24,415 cubic meters 20,399 cubic meters 4,016 cubic meters Australia
2010s 20,836 cubic meters 19,604 cubic meters 1,232 cubic meters Australia
2020s 19,082 cubic meters 19,306 cubic meters 224.37 cubic meters Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Australia or Finland?
Finland, at 19,258 cubic meters against 18,910 cubic meters in Australia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Australia and Finland?
348 cubic meters, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Finland?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Australia and Finland rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Australia ranks 32nd and Finland ranks 31st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Finland: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/australia/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/australia/finland/">Australia vs Finland: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.