Armenia vs South Sudan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Armenia
2,310 cubic meters
in 2022
South Sudan
2,359 cubic meters
in 2022
Armenia rank
97th
South Sudan rank
94th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Armenia
  • South Sudan
01.0k2.0k3.0k199220072022

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 2,359 cubic meters against 2,310 cubic meters in Armenia, a difference of 49 cubic meters.

Across all 11 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 97th and South Sudan ranks 94th of 183 countries.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 2,290 cubic meters 2,425 cubic meters 135.26 cubic meters South Sudan
2020s 2,314 cubic meters 2,394 cubic meters 80.21 cubic meters South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Armenia or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 2,359 cubic meters against 2,310 cubic meters in Armenia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Armenia and South Sudan?
49 cubic meters, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and South Sudan?
11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
How do Armenia and South Sudan rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Armenia ranks 97th and South Sudan ranks 94th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs South Sudan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/armenia/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/armenia/south-sudan/">Armenia vs South Sudan: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.