How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Slovakia?

30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Armenia vs Slovakia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Armenia

2,310 cubic meters

in 2022

Slovakia

2,320 cubic meters

in 2022

Armenia rank

97th

Slovakia rank

96th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

Armenia
Slovakia

How they compare

Slovakia currently reports 2,320 cubic meters against 2,310 cubic meters in Armenia, a difference of 10 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.

Armenia ranks 97th and Slovakia ranks 96th of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Armenia	Slovakia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	2,087 cubic meters	2,347 cubic meters	260.56 cubic meters	Slovakia
2000s	2,177 cubic meters	2,343 cubic meters	165.99 cubic meters	Slovakia
2010s	2,283 cubic meters	2,324 cubic meters	40.29 cubic meters	Slovakia
2020s	2,314 cubic meters	2,314 cubic meters	0.19 cubic meters	Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Armenia or Slovakia?: Slovakia, at 2,320 cubic meters against 2,310 cubic meters in Armenia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Armenia and Slovakia?: 10 cubic meters, with Slovakia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Slovakia?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2022.
How do Armenia and Slovakia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?: Armenia ranks 97th and Slovakia ranks 96th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Slovakia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/armenia/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/armenia/slovak-republic/">Armenia vs Slovakia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit: cubic meters
Source: AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.