Argentina vs Nepal: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Argentina
6,431 cubic meters
in 2022
Nepal
6,670 cubic meters
in 2022
Argentina rank
60th
Nepal rank
59th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Argentina
  • Nepal
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119912022

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 6,670 cubic meters against 6,431 cubic meters in Argentina, a difference of 239 cubic meters.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 60th and Nepal ranks 59th of 183 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 13,227 cubic meters 17,742 cubic meters 4,516 cubic meters Nepal
1970s 11,393 cubic meters 14,467 cubic meters 3,074 cubic meters Nepal
1980s 9,716 cubic meters 11,516 cubic meters 1,799 cubic meters Nepal
1990s 8,399 cubic meters 9,089 cubic meters 690.14 cubic meters Nepal
2000s 7,489 cubic meters 7,621 cubic meters 131.78 cubic meters Nepal
2010s 6,763 cubic meters 7,133 cubic meters 370.1 cubic meters Nepal
2020s 6,445 cubic meters 6,746 cubic meters 300.18 cubic meters Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Argentina or Nepal?
Nepal, at 6,670 cubic meters against 6,431 cubic meters in Argentina as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Argentina and Nepal?
239 cubic meters, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Nepal?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Argentina and Nepal rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Argentina ranks 60th and Nepal ranks 59th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Nepal: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/argentina/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/argentina/nepal/">Argentina vs Nepal: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.