Argentina vs Guatemala: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Argentina
6,431 cubic meters
in 2022
Guatemala
6,118 cubic meters
in 2022
Argentina rank
60th
Guatemala rank
62nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Argentina
  • Guatemala
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119912022

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 6,431 cubic meters against 6,118 cubic meters in Guatemala, a difference of 313 cubic meters.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Argentina ranks 60th and Guatemala ranks 62nd of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 13,227 cubic meters 23,300 cubic meters 10,073 cubic meters Guatemala
1970s 11,393 cubic meters 18,134 cubic meters 6,741 cubic meters Guatemala
1980s 9,716 cubic meters 14,122 cubic meters 4,405 cubic meters Guatemala
1990s 8,399 cubic meters 10,771 cubic meters 2,372 cubic meters Guatemala
2000s 7,489 cubic meters 8,465 cubic meters 975.83 cubic meters Guatemala
2010s 6,763 cubic meters 6,922 cubic meters 158.61 cubic meters Guatemala
2020s 6,445 cubic meters 6,205 cubic meters 240.47 cubic meters Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Argentina or Guatemala?
Argentina, at 6,431 cubic meters against 6,118 cubic meters in Guatemala as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Argentina and Guatemala?
313 cubic meters, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Guatemala?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Argentina and Guatemala rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Argentina ranks 60th and Guatemala ranks 62nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Guatemala: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/argentina/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/argentina/guatemala/">Argentina vs Guatemala: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.