Argentina vs Cambodia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Argentina
6,431 cubic meters
in 2022
Cambodia
7,011 cubic meters
in 2022
Argentina rank
60th
Cambodia rank
58th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Argentina
  • Cambodia
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119912022

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 7,011 cubic meters against 6,431 cubic meters in Argentina, a difference of 580 cubic meters.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 60th and Cambodia ranks 58th of 183 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Cambodia Difference Ahead
1960s 13,227 cubic meters 19,896 cubic meters 6,669 cubic meters Cambodia
1970s 11,393 cubic meters 19,622 cubic meters 8,229 cubic meters Cambodia
1980s 9,716 cubic meters 20,251 cubic meters 10,535 cubic meters Cambodia
1990s 8,399 cubic meters 12,742 cubic meters 4,343 cubic meters Cambodia
2000s 7,489 cubic meters 9,049 cubic meters 1,560 cubic meters Cambodia
2010s 6,763 cubic meters 7,792 cubic meters 1,029 cubic meters Cambodia
2020s 6,445 cubic meters 7,109 cubic meters 663.42 cubic meters Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Argentina or Cambodia?
Cambodia, at 7,011 cubic meters against 6,431 cubic meters in Argentina as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Argentina and Cambodia?
580 cubic meters, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Cambodia?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Argentina and Cambodia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Argentina ranks 60th and Cambodia ranks 58th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Cambodia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/argentina/cambodia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/argentina/cambodia/">Argentina vs Cambodia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.