Argentina vs Austria: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Argentina
6,431 cubic meters
in 2022
Austria
6,083 cubic meters
in 2022
Argentina rank
60th
Austria rank
63rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Argentina
  • Austria
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119912022

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 6,431 cubic meters against 6,083 cubic meters in Austria, a difference of 348 cubic meters.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 60th and Austria ranks 63rd of 183 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Austria Difference Ahead
1960s 13,227 cubic meters 7,566 cubic meters 5,661 cubic meters Argentina
1970s 11,393 cubic meters 7,283 cubic meters 4,110 cubic meters Argentina
1980s 9,716 cubic meters 7,263 cubic meters 2,453 cubic meters Argentina
1990s 8,399 cubic meters 6,967 cubic meters 1,432 cubic meters Argentina
2000s 7,489 cubic meters 6,718 cubic meters 771.11 cubic meters Argentina
2010s 6,763 cubic meters 6,390 cubic meters 372.97 cubic meters Argentina
2020s 6,445 cubic meters 6,131 cubic meters 314.64 cubic meters Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Argentina or Austria?
Argentina, at 6,431 cubic meters against 6,083 cubic meters in Austria as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Argentina and Austria?
348 cubic meters, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Austria?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Argentina and Austria rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Argentina ranks 60th and Austria ranks 63rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Austria: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/argentina/austria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/argentina/austria/">Argentina vs Austria: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.