Angola vs Switzerland: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Angola
4,153 cubic meters
in 2022
Switzerland
4,603 cubic meters
in 2022
Angola rank
69th
Switzerland rank
67th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Angola
  • Switzerland
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k30.0k196119912022

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 4,603 cubic meters against 4,153 cubic meters in Angola, a difference of 450 cubic meters.

That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 69th and Switzerland ranks 67th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 6 and Switzerland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Switzerland Difference Ahead
1960s 26,799 cubic meters 6,941 cubic meters 19,858 cubic meters Angola
1970s 22,067 cubic meters 6,433 cubic meters 15,634 cubic meters Angola
1980s 15,527 cubic meters 6,247 cubic meters 9,280 cubic meters Angola
1990s 11,021 cubic meters 5,792 cubic meters 5,229 cubic meters Angola
2000s 7,837 cubic meters 5,441 cubic meters 2,396 cubic meters Angola
2010s 5,397 cubic meters 4,919 cubic meters 478.31 cubic meters Angola
2020s 4,288 cubic meters 4,640 cubic meters 352.55 cubic meters Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Angola or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 4,603 cubic meters against 4,153 cubic meters in Angola as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Angola and Switzerland?
450 cubic meters, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Switzerland?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Angola and Switzerland rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Angola ranks 69th and Switzerland ranks 67th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Switzerland: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/angola/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/angola/switzerland/">Angola vs Switzerland: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.