Angola vs Lithuania: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Angola
4,153 cubic meters
in 2022
Lithuania
5,460 cubic meters
in 2022
Angola rank
69th
Lithuania rank
66th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Angola
  • Lithuania
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k30.0k196119912022

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 5,460 cubic meters against 4,153 cubic meters in Angola, a difference of 1,307 cubic meters.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.3 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 69th and Lithuania ranks 66th of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 3 and Lithuania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 10,647 cubic meters 4,278 cubic meters 6,369 cubic meters Angola
2000s 7,837 cubic meters 4,635 cubic meters 3,202 cubic meters Angola
2010s 5,397 cubic meters 5,286 cubic meters 111.17 cubic meters Angola
2020s 4,288 cubic meters 5,489 cubic meters 1,201 cubic meters Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Angola or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 5,460 cubic meters against 4,153 cubic meters in Angola as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Angola and Lithuania?
1,307 cubic meters, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Lithuania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Angola and Lithuania rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Angola ranks 69th and Lithuania ranks 66th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Lithuania: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/angola/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/angola/lithuania/">Angola vs Lithuania: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.