Andorra vs Zambia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Andorra
3,960 cubic meters
in 2022
Zambia
3,980 cubic meters
in 2022
Andorra rank
71st
Zambia rank
70th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Andorra
  • Zambia
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k30.0k196119912022

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 3,980 cubic meters against 3,960 cubic meters in Andorra, a difference of 20 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Andorra ahead.

Andorra ranks 71st and Zambia ranks 70th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Andorra averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Andorra Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 22,465 cubic meters 21,427 cubic meters 1,038 cubic meters Andorra
1970s 12,029 cubic meters 16,348 cubic meters 4,319 cubic meters Zambia
1980s 7,404 cubic meters 12,084 cubic meters 4,679 cubic meters Zambia
1990s 5,106 cubic meters 9,250 cubic meters 4,143 cubic meters Zambia
2000s 4,257 cubic meters 6,962 cubic meters 2,705 cubic meters Zambia
2010s 4,190 cubic meters 4,995 cubic meters 805.09 cubic meters Zambia
2020s 4,022 cubic meters 4,093 cubic meters 71.01 cubic meters Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Andorra or Zambia?
Zambia, at 3,980 cubic meters against 3,960 cubic meters in Andorra as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Andorra and Zambia?
20 cubic meters, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Andorra and Zambia?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2022.
How do Andorra and Zambia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Andorra ranks 71st and Zambia ranks 70th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Andorra vs Zambia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/andorra/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/andorra/zambia/">Andorra vs Zambia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.