Africa Eastern and Southern vs Sweden: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Africa Eastern and Southern
2,713 cubic meters
in 2022
Sweden
16,306 cubic meters
in 2022
Africa Eastern and Southern rank
38th
Sweden rank
37th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Africa Eastern and Southern
  • Sweden
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119912022

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 16,306 cubic meters against 2,713 cubic meters in Africa Eastern and Southern, a difference of 13,593 cubic meters.

That makes Sweden's figure about 6.0 times Africa Eastern and Southern's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 38th and Sweden ranks 37th of 47 groups.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Eastern and Southern Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 16,587 cubic meters 22,109 cubic meters 5,522 cubic meters Sweden
1970s 12,598 cubic meters 20,908 cubic meters 8,310 cubic meters Sweden
1980s 9,213 cubic meters 20,438 cubic meters 11,226 cubic meters Sweden
1990s 6,363 cubic meters 19,531 cubic meters 13,168 cubic meters Sweden
2000s 4,682 cubic meters 18,916 cubic meters 14,233 cubic meters Sweden
2010s 3,383 cubic meters 17,487 cubic meters 14,104 cubic meters Sweden
2020s 2,786 cubic meters 16,413 cubic meters 13,627 cubic meters Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Africa Eastern and Southern or Sweden?
Sweden, at 16,306 cubic meters against 2,713 cubic meters in Africa Eastern and Southern as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Africa Eastern and Southern and Sweden?
13,593 cubic meters, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Eastern and Southern and Sweden?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Africa Eastern and Southern and Sweden rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 38th and Sweden ranks 37th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Eastern and Southern vs Sweden: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/africa-eastern-and-southern/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/africa-eastern-and-southern/sweden/">Africa Eastern and Southern vs Sweden: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.