Africa Eastern and Southern vs Myanmar: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Africa Eastern and Southern
2,713 cubic meters
in 2022
Myanmar
18,654 cubic meters
in 2022
Africa Eastern and Southern rank
38th
Myanmar rank
34th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Africa Eastern and Southern
  • Myanmar
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119912022

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 18,654 cubic meters against 2,713 cubic meters in Africa Eastern and Southern, a difference of 15,941 cubic meters.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 6.9 times Africa Eastern and Southern's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.

Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 38th and Myanmar ranks 34th of 47 groups.

Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Eastern and Southern Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 16,587 cubic meters 41,357 cubic meters 24,771 cubic meters Myanmar
1970s 12,598 cubic meters 33,659 cubic meters 21,061 cubic meters Myanmar
1980s 9,213 cubic meters 27,755 cubic meters 18,542 cubic meters Myanmar
1990s 6,363 cubic meters 23,727 cubic meters 17,364 cubic meters Myanmar
2000s 4,682 cubic meters 21,283 cubic meters 16,600 cubic meters Myanmar
2010s 3,383 cubic meters 19,727 cubic meters 16,344 cubic meters Myanmar
2020s 2,786 cubic meters 18,784 cubic meters 15,999 cubic meters Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Africa Eastern and Southern or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at 18,654 cubic meters against 2,713 cubic meters in Africa Eastern and Southern as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Africa Eastern and Southern and Myanmar?
15,941 cubic meters, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Eastern and Southern and Myanmar?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Africa Eastern and Southern and Myanmar rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 38th and Myanmar ranks 34th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Eastern and Southern vs Myanmar: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/africa-eastern-and-southern/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/africa-eastern-and-southern/myanmar/">Africa Eastern and Southern vs Myanmar: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.