Africa Eastern and Southern vs Malaysia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Africa Eastern and Southern
2,713 cubic meters
in 2022
Malaysia
16,717 cubic meters
in 2022
Africa Eastern and Southern rank
38th
Malaysia rank
36th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Africa Eastern and Southern
  • Malaysia
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119912022

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 16,717 cubic meters against 2,713 cubic meters in Africa Eastern and Southern, a difference of 14,004 cubic meters.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 6.2 times Africa Eastern and Southern's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.

Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 38th and Malaysia ranks 36th of 47 groups.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Eastern and Southern Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 16,587 cubic meters 64,315 cubic meters 47,728 cubic meters Malaysia
1970s 12,598 cubic meters 51,285 cubic meters 38,688 cubic meters Malaysia
1980s 9,213 cubic meters 38,828 cubic meters 29,615 cubic meters Malaysia
1990s 6,363 cubic meters 29,003 cubic meters 22,640 cubic meters Malaysia
2000s 4,682 cubic meters 22,798 cubic meters 18,116 cubic meters Malaysia
2010s 3,383 cubic meters 18,751 cubic meters 15,368 cubic meters Malaysia
2020s 2,786 cubic meters 16,917 cubic meters 14,131 cubic meters Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Africa Eastern and Southern or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 16,717 cubic meters against 2,713 cubic meters in Africa Eastern and Southern as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Africa Eastern and Southern and Malaysia?
14,004 cubic meters, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Eastern and Southern and Malaysia?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Africa Eastern and Southern and Malaysia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 38th and Malaysia ranks 36th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Eastern and Southern vs Malaysia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/africa-eastern-and-southern/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/africa-eastern-and-southern/malaysia/">Africa Eastern and Southern vs Malaysia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.