Afghanistan vs Serbia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita

Afghanistan
1,162 cubic meters
in 2022
Serbia
1,261 cubic meters
in 2022
Afghanistan rank
122nd
Serbia rank
119th

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Serbia
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196219922022

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 1,261 cubic meters against 1,162 cubic meters in Afghanistan, a difference of 99 cubic meters.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 122nd and Serbia ranks 119th of 183 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 1,793 cubic meters 1,141 cubic meters 651.5 cubic meters Afghanistan
2010s 1,435 cubic meters 1,182 cubic meters 252.58 cubic meters Afghanistan
2020s 1,183 cubic meters 1,237 cubic meters 54.21 cubic meters Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, Afghanistan or Serbia?
Serbia, at 1,261 cubic meters against 1,162 cubic meters in Afghanistan as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources per capita between Afghanistan and Serbia?
99 cubic meters, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Serbia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
How do Afghanistan and Serbia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
Afghanistan ranks 122nd and Serbia ranks 119th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Serbia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/afghanistan/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-per-capita-cubic-meters/afghanistan/serbia/">Afghanistan vs Serbia: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 13,255 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.