Egypt vs Malaysia: Public private partnerships investment in transport

Egypt
1.36 billion current US$
in 2023
Malaysia
1.54 billion current US$
in 2017
Egypt rank
9th
Malaysia rank
8th

Public private partnerships investment in transport over time

  • Egypt
  • Malaysia
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B5.0B198520042023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 1.54 billion current US$ against 1.36 billion current US$ in Egypt, a difference of 178.00 million current US$.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Malaysia ahead.

Egypt ranks 9th and Malaysia ranks 8th of 35 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Malaysia Difference Ahead
1990s 123.90 million current US$ 591.90 million current US$ 468.00 million current US$ Malaysia
2000s 365.25 million current US$ 590.18 million current US$ 224.93 million current US$ Malaysia
2010s 498.00 million current US$ 1.54 billion current US$ 1.04 billion current US$ Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher public private partnerships investment in transport, Egypt or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 1.54 billion current US$ against 1.36 billion current US$ in Egypt as of 2017.
What is the difference in public private partnerships investment in transport between Egypt and Malaysia?
178.00 million current US$, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Malaysia?
8 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2017.
How do Egypt and Malaysia rank globally for public private partnerships investment in transport?
Egypt ranks 9th and Malaysia ranks 8th of 35 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Private Participation in Infrastructure Project Database, World Bank (WB), published as Public private partnerships investment in transport (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Malaysia: Public private partnerships investment in transport. Statizoid, drawing on Private Participation in Infrastructure Project Database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/public-private-partnerships-investment-in-transport-current-us/egypt-arab-rep/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/public-private-partnerships-investment-in-transport-current-us/egypt-arab-rep/malaysia/">Egypt vs Malaysia: Public private partnerships investment in transport</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Public private partnerships investment in transport (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Private Participation in Infrastructure Project Database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
51 places, 825 data points, 1984–2024
Last refreshed

The Private Participation In Infrastructure (PPI) Database records contractual arrangements for public infrastructure projects in low- and middle-income countries (as classified by the World Bank) that have reached financial closure, in which private parties assume operating risk. Public private partnerships in transport refers to commitments to infrastructure projects in transport [(a) airport runways and terminals, (b) railways (including fixed assets, freight, intercity passenger, and local passenger); (c) toll roads, bridges, highways, and tunnels, (d) port infrastructure, superstructures, terminals, and channels)] that have reached financial closure and directly or indirectly serve the public. The types of projects included are management and lease contracts, brownfield projects, and greenfield projects (in which a private entity or a public-private joint venture builds and operates a new facility). Divestitures and merchant projects are excluded. Investments are classified as one of two types: (1) Investments in physical assets: resources the project company commits to invest in expanding and modernizing facilities and (2) Payments to the government: to acquire state-owned enterprises or rights to provide services in a specific area or to use radio spectrum. Data is presented based on investment year. Data are in current U.S. dollars.