China vs East Asia & Pacific: Public private partnerships investment in transport

China
3.33 billion current US$
in 2024
East Asia & Pacific
32.42 billion current US$
in 2022
China rank
4th
East Asia & Pacific rank
4th

Public private partnerships investment in transport over time

  • China
  • East Asia & Pacific
010.0B20.0B30.0B199020072024

How they compare

East Asia & Pacific currently reports 32.42 billion current US$ against 3.33 billion current US$ in China, a difference of 29.09 billion current US$.

That makes East Asia & Pacific's figure about 9.7 times China's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, East Asia & Pacific has been ahead every year.

China ranks 4th and East Asia & Pacific ranks 4th of 35 countries.

East Asia & Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China East Asia & Pacific Difference Ahead
1990s 1.37 billion current US$ 3.27 billion current US$ 1.91 billion current US$ East Asia & Pacific
2000s 1.76 billion current US$ 2.75 billion current US$ 991.59 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific
2010s 11.35 billion current US$ 16.24 billion current US$ 4.89 billion current US$ East Asia & Pacific
2020s 17.47 billion current US$ 23.81 billion current US$ 6.34 billion current US$ East Asia & Pacific

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher public private partnerships investment in transport, China or East Asia & Pacific?
East Asia & Pacific, at 32.42 billion current US$ against 3.33 billion current US$ in China as of 2022.
What is the difference in public private partnerships investment in transport between China and East Asia & Pacific?
29.09 billion current US$, with East Asia & Pacific ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and East Asia & Pacific?
25 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2022.
How do China and East Asia & Pacific rank globally for public private partnerships investment in transport?
China ranks 4th and East Asia & Pacific ranks 4th of 35 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Private Participation in Infrastructure Project Database, World Bank (WB), published as Public private partnerships investment in transport (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs East Asia & Pacific: Public private partnerships investment in transport. Statizoid, drawing on Private Participation in Infrastructure Project Database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/public-private-partnerships-investment-in-transport-current-us/china/east-asia-and-pacific/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/public-private-partnerships-investment-in-transport-current-us/china/east-asia-and-pacific/">China vs East Asia & Pacific: Public private partnerships investment in transport</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Public private partnerships investment in transport (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Private Participation in Infrastructure Project Database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
51 places, 825 data points, 1984–2024
Last refreshed

The Private Participation In Infrastructure (PPI) Database records contractual arrangements for public infrastructure projects in low- and middle-income countries (as classified by the World Bank) that have reached financial closure, in which private parties assume operating risk. Public private partnerships in transport refers to commitments to infrastructure projects in transport [(a) airport runways and terminals, (b) railways (including fixed assets, freight, intercity passenger, and local passenger); (c) toll roads, bridges, highways, and tunnels, (d) port infrastructure, superstructures, terminals, and channels)] that have reached financial closure and directly or indirectly serve the public. The types of projects included are management and lease contracts, brownfield projects, and greenfield projects (in which a private entity or a public-private joint venture builds and operates a new facility). Divestitures and merchant projects are excluded. Investments are classified as one of two types: (1) Investments in physical assets: resources the project company commits to invest in expanding and modernizing facilities and (2) Payments to the government: to acquire state-owned enterprises or rights to provide services in a specific area or to use radio spectrum. Data is presented based on investment year. Data are in current U.S. dollars.