Southern Africa vs Zimbabwe: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of
Southern Africa
19.0%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
60.0%
in 2025
Southern Africa rank
13th
Zimbabwe rank
10th
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of over time
- Southern Africa
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 60.0% against 19.0% in Southern Africa, a difference of 41.0%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 3.2 times Southern Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Southern Africa ranks 13th and Zimbabwe ranks 10th of 29 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Southern Africa | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.2% | 30.0% | 12.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 13.0% | 27.0% | 14.0% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 14.7% | 32.7% | 18.0% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of, Southern Africa or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 60.0% against 19.0% in Southern Africa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of between Southern Africa and Zimbabwe?
- 41.0%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Africa and Zimbabwe?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Southern Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
- Southern Africa ranks 13th and Zimbabwe ranks 10th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.