Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Sweden: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
11.6%
in 2025
Sweden
67.0%
in 2025
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
24th
Sweden rank
7th

Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of over time

  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
  • Sweden
204060200020122025

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 67.0% against 11.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 55.4%.

That makes Sweden's figure about 5.8 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 24th and Sweden ranks 7th of 29 groups.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 16.1% 67.0% 50.9% Sweden
2010s 18.8% 67.0% 48.2% Sweden
2020s 11.2% 67.0% 55.8% Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or Sweden?
Sweden, at 67.0% against 11.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Sweden?
55.4%, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Sweden?
16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Sweden rank globally for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 24th and Sweden ranks 7th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Sweden: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-as-a-share/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-as-a-share/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/sweden/">Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Sweden: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
168 places, 3,169 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed