Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Nicaragua: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
11.6%
in 2025
Nicaragua
100.0%
in 2013
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
24th
Nicaragua rank
1st

Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of over time

  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
  • Nicaragua
20406080100200020122025

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 100.0% against 11.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 88.4%.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 8.6 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 24th and Nicaragua ranks 1st of 29 groups.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Nicaragua Difference Ahead
2000s 17.8% 100.0% 82.2% Nicaragua
2010s 18.8% 100.0% 81.2% Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 100.0% against 11.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2013.
What is the difference in proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Nicaragua?
88.4%, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Nicaragua?
10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Nicaragua rank globally for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 24th and Nicaragua ranks 1st of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Nicaragua: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-as-a-share/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-as-a-share/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/nicaragua/">Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Nicaragua: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
168 places, 3,169 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed