Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Malaysia: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
11.6%
in 2025
Malaysia
40.0%
in 2025
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
24th
Malaysia rank
21st

Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk over time

  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
  • Malaysia
010203040200020122025

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 40.0% against 11.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 28.4%.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 3.5 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malaysia ahead.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 24th and Malaysia ranks 21st of 29 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Malaysia Difference Ahead
2000s 16.1% 17.4% 1.3% Malaysia
2010s 18.8% 13.0% 5.8% Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2020s 11.2% 40.0% 28.8% Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 40.0% against 11.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Malaysia?
28.4%, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Malaysia?
16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Malaysia rank globally for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 24th and Malaysia ranks 21st of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Malaysia: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-as-a-share/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-as-a-share/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/malaysia/">Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Malaysia: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
168 places, 3,169 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed