Kyrgyzstan vs Nicaragua: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of
Kyrgyzstan
100.0%
in 2013
Nicaragua
100.0%
in 2013
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st
Nicaragua rank
1st
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Nicaragua ranks 1st of 139 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.0% | 100.0% | 67.0% | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 66.5% | 100.0% | 33.5% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of, Kyrgyzstan or Nicaragua?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Nicaragua as of 2013.
- What is the difference in proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of between Kyrgyzstan and Nicaragua?
- 0.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Nicaragua?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Nicaragua rank globally for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Nicaragua ranks 1st of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.